The DFG sees the term “digital turn” as comprising all relevant changes and impacts in epistemic, ethical, legal, technical, infrastructural, organisational, financial and also social terms which arise from the development and use of digital technologies in science and the humanities.

Despite the diverse impacts of the digital turn in science and the humanities, the DFG believes these will not lead to a fundamental change in the requirements for scientific excellence, but above all include the emergence of new – digital – research practices, which can also be subjected to epistemic reclassification in the respective subject-specific context.

The digital turn is not a phenomenon that is restricted to scientific research: digital technologies and processes are relevant in all areas of society and the economy. The widespread use and development of digital technologies alter the relationship between publicly funded research and that of other stakeholders – the global internet corporations, for example. It is crucial in this situation for science and the humanities to grasp the opportunities afforded by the digital turn and actively commit to assessing and overcoming the challenges according to their own principles and in their own interests.

In a science-led discussion process over recent years, the DFG has fostered dialogue on the issue of the digital turn in the sciences and humanities in connection with topics such as the Handling of Research Data, as well as offering additional specific funding opportunities (e.g. Sustainability of Research Software (in German only), Artificial Intelligence, funded projects through calls for research software: 1st Call for Proposals / 2nd Call for Proposals). In the future, too, the DFG is committed to pursuing the following four areas of activity so as to ensure that science and the humanities can help shape the digital turn; for details, see the impulse paper:

1. Subject-specific and interdisciplinary discourse
2. Statutory bodies and competencies of the DFG
3. Funding programmes

Since the successful completion of the restructuring project “The Digital Turn in the Sciences and Humanities” in March 2020 and the publication of the DFG’s impulse paper of the same title in October 2020, the Senate’s mandate is have the DFG Head Office implement the proposed measures in the four areas of activity as set out in the impulse paper.

The purpose of the DFG’s strategic project “The Digital Turn” is to help shape this implementation process. Proceeding in a coherent and systematic manner, the DFG seeks to take on a formative role in this dynamic field so as to provide the best possible support for the research community in meeting both known challenges and those yet to emerge.

The main objective of the project is to implement measures to help shape the digital turn in the sciences and humanities within the four areas of activity. 

Contacts at the DFG Head Office:

• Dr. Matthias Katerbow
• Dr. Michael Lentze

The Senate has set up an ad hoc working group (in German only) so as to involve the DFG’s statutory bodies in the work being done under the strategic programme on the digital turn (PDW) in a coherent and systematic manner, thereby enabling the DFG as a whole to play a formative role in this dynamic field. In addition to providing conceptual support for the strategic programme, the working group is to consider the needs of the research community with regard to the digital turn in order to establish a basis for further action in the area of research policy on the part of the Executive Committee and Senate.

• Research grants: the Research Grants Programme (Guideline 50.01) provides numerous options to fund projects relating to the digital turn in the sciences and humanities. A research grant enables everyone who has completed their academic training to conduct a research project that is limited in time and scope – at any time and irrespective of the subject.
• Coordinated programmes: there is frequently a need for larger consortia when addressing interdisciplinary issues as they arise in the context of the digital turn.  Suitable funding programmes in such cases are those for Collaborative Research Centres (CRCs) (Guideline 50.06) and Research Training Groups (RTGs) (Guideline 50.07), in particular in the case of predominantly locally based consortia.
• Priority Programmes: One particular feature of Priority Programmes is nationwide collaboration between participating researchers. Priority Programmes (Guideline 50.05) can be set up by the DFG Senate if the coordinated funding promises benefits in the relevant field of research. The Senate negotiates once a year on the setting up of Priority Programmes for proposed initiatives arising in science and the humanities.

• Scientific Library Services and Information Systems: 
  the objective of this funding stream is to create a coordinated system of information infrastructures for science and the humanities; it aims to provide users free and extensive access to research information and to link research information and data. Project proposals under the e-Research Technologies funding programme (Guideline 12.19) can be used to address numerous challenges and needs arising as a result of the digital turn. The Information Infrastructures for Research Data programme (Guideline 12.14) and the National Research Data Infrastructure (NFDI) are relevant to the topic of research data.
• Research instrumentation and information technology: 
  Successful research requires access to costly and specific technological instrumentation. The DFG funds project-specific instrumentation within its general research funding. In the case of major research instrumentation of an infrastructural nature that is required for multiple research projects, it is possible to submit a funding proposal to the DFG under the programme Major Research Instrumentation (as per Article 91b of the Basic Law). In addition to the established programmes for instrumentation and IT infrastructure funding, three new programmes relating to instrumentation research funding were included in the DFG funding portfolio at the end of 2017. For example, the programme New Instrumentation for Research is designed to enable researchers themselves to develop new instrumentation for use in science and the humanities, including prototypes.

In the case of some projects, it is not always possible or useful to draw a clear distinction between research and the development of information infrastructure. For this reason, in the case of projects involving both extensive research and the development/provision of scientific information and/or information infrastructures, it is possible to submit a proposal for a so-called “bridge project“.