Sustainability Guide for Research Processes

Latest developments

  • The guidelines sheets and forms for various DFG funding programmes were supplemented in March 2024 to include the topic of sustainability in funding activities (see: Forms and guidelines). As of 1 September 2024, proposals following the old model are no longer accepted.
  • The DFG is committed to anchoring the concept of sustainability in its funding activities in the area of scientific instrumentation and information technology, too. The call for Ideas “Towards Resource-Efficient Major Instrumentation in Research” issued in November 2023 aims to explore the possibilities of concrete funding opportunities dedicated to the sustainable use of instrumentation.

 

The Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) aims to take appropriate account of ecological sustainability aspects, both in its own activities and in research processes, with scientific excellence always taking centre stage. Since March 2024, proposal guides and forms have asked applicants to “reflect on ecological sustainability aspects in the planning and implementation of research projects”. Applicants are required to present their ideas here in a concise and plausible manner. The aim is to stimulate creativity, initiate ideas and raise awareness of sustainable research so as to establish new standards in research activity by means of a bottom-up process.

The primary aim is to focus on aspects which researchers themselves regard as having an impact, for example in terms of emissions and resources. Striving for high-quality research remains the top priority when planning and designing a project, Ideas on sustainability should not negatively affect knowledge production. To support research that is both excellent and held to high sustainability standards, it is possible to state the need for increased funding for lower-emission and resource-saving research designs directly in the proposal.

Catalogue of Guiding Questions

In order to support reflection during the proposal submission process, the DFG Sustainability Commission has drawn up an interdisciplinary catalogue of guiding questions aimed at incorporating sustainability aspects in the research process. It contains exemplary points of reference and questions that are intended to serve as a source of inspiration and are to be understood as an offer; these provide examples and are neither exhaustive nor complete. The catalogue can help weigh up different approaches to carrying out resource-friendly and climate-friendly studies and the benefits and drawbacks these involve, as well as providing support in identifying potential conflicts of interest. The questions and examples listed cover four areas. 

The catalogue is also available as a PDF download.

  • Can the objective of a trip be achieved in another way, for example through digital communication, and still accomplish a comparable result when it comes to knowledge transfer or building networks? Extra considerations here might include the situations of people in early career phases as well as actual networking needs for people in a given field or international environment.
  • Can emissions be reduced by adapting the means of travel or routes? Can air travel be replaced or linked to other stages of the project? Are direct flights available, even if they are more expensive?
  • Can a quantitative estimate of the environmental impact (especially CO2 emissions) caused by the project’s travel be made?
  • Organisation of conferences: Could hybrid or digital formats be a sensible alternative? 

Example

Acquiring geological samples: Acquiring new samples often requires travel and transport, which gives rise to CO2 emissions. The latter can be reduced by using existing material as far as possible. When designing the project, consideration is given to whether and where the material required or suitable for achieving the scientific objectives may already be available.

Literature

Journal of Cleaner Production, August 2023,Shifting from academic air travel to sustainable research exchang:Examining networking efficacy during virtual conferences

General

  • Which methodological approaches offer the most potential for limiting resources used and reducing emissions that are harmful to the climate and the environment?
  • Can the design and scaling of the experiment or field trial be better adjusted to the scope required to answer the question, or could a simulation be (partially) used instead?
  • Taking into consideration the uniqueness of the planned research, could available existing data be used to progress the project under more sustainable conditions?
  • Could the complete use of data and/or (if possible) making available of data and/or reuse of available data mean that new measurements and experiments could be more focused or even redundant?

Laboratory equipment and non-renewable materials

  • Is it possible to reasonably reduce non-renewables, reuse items or use items made of recycled material?
  • Can providers be found that sell more energy-efficient products?
  • Could purchasing smaller quantities reduce the effort and cost required for storage? Emissions and resource consumption caused by transport must also be taken into account.

Example

The research proposal refers to existing sustainability certificates or the relevant specifications in the laboratory in question, where applicable.

Samples

  • Is it possible to draw on existing samples?
  • Is it possible within reason to reduce the amount of material, reuse the material or make it available to others?
  • Is it possible to store objects in a more climate-friendly and energy-efficient way? For example, can samples be stored at a lower or higher temperature?

Examples

  • Shared use of existing equipment or materials and testing of the reusability of laboratory equipment or sample containers, for example.
  • Replace environmentally harmful and climate-damaging substances used in laboratory and field research with more climate-friendly and ecofriendly compounds such as cryton/helium mixtures instead of SF6 tracers. 
  • Check whether smaller quantities of the sample can be used if environmentally harmful chemicals are involved (e.g. smaller soil samples); establish measures/protocols to reduce contaminated water in laboratory research, e.g. water when washing roots.

Literature

The responsible use of natural resources in field research: American Journal of Primatology, October 2012,Reducing the Ecological Impact of Field Research

  • Can energy consumption be reduced by planning the simulations to be carried out clearly hypothesis-driven and even more efficiently?
  • Can the computing power for modelling, simulation, evaluation and visualisation be reduced? Would cloud-based solutions be a resource-saving option? Is it possible to use suppliers who provide green electricity?
  • When selecting the parameters for a simulation, can you use less energy while maintaining a similar quality of results?
  • Could existing simulation data from other sources be used to reduce resource consumption and emissions?
  • Might there be potential for a reduction of resources based on complete utilisation and/or (as far as possible) provision and/or reuse of the simulation data collected?
  • Can specific statements be made on the environmental impact (specifically with regard to CO2 emission levels) caused by time-intensive computing simulations?

Examples

  • Define benchmarks to determine the most efficient programme in cases where several software packages are available that offer the functionalities required for your project.
  • In the case of decentralised or non-shared computer resources, take care to ensure appropriately intense and sensible utilisation of resource capacity as well as efficient operation.
  • Raise awareness of resource consumption, for example by issuing lists of monthly CPU/GPU hours of use or else providing a conversion into electricity costs or an estimate of the amount of CO2.
  • Draw on measures and support services for the efficient use of computer resources or obtain them from appropriate service providers (keywords: training programmes on HPC use, green IT strategies at the university, performance engineering for research software).
  • Is it necessary to purchase new instrumentation? Or is there instrumentation that is already available or that can be repaired – also in neighbouring work groups or core facilities, for example? Would the new instrumentation be more energy-efficient than any existing instrumentation?
  • Before purchasing new instrumentation, what information is available on its environmental impact and its capacity to reduce the use of resources and emissions during its production and operation?
  • Are there ways of achieving even more efficient use of resources and lower emissions in terms of service life and reparability when purchasing new instrumentation and with a view to usage requirements?
  • Has any thought been given to the decommissioning of instrumentation, for example with regard to recycling?

Examples

  • Freezer Challenge”: The challenge is an international competition organised by “My Green Lab” and “I2SL” (International Institute for Sustainable Laboratories). The aim is to promote and disseminate best-practice measures for the effective storage of samples and the energy-saving management of freezers and refrigerators.
  • Shared use of instrumentation or development of a utilisation concept: shared use of instrumentation – based on centralised and coordinated allocation of usage time, for example – promotes efficient and resource-saving use.
  • Instrumentation repair: Scientific instrumentation and information technology are two of the areas in which the DFG is committed to anchoring the concept of sustainability in its funding activities. For this reason, there are now expanded options for having DFG-funded instrumentation repaired.

Commission Recommendations

Drawn up by the DFG Sustainability Commission in 2021, the recommendations conclude the work of the twenty-member interdisciplinary group headed by DFG President Professor Dr. Katja Becker. While focusing on ecological sustainability, the recommendations do not ignore links to other dimensions such as social and economic sustainability.

Background

Science and the humanities are likewise urgently called upon to take action when it comes to climate protection and the conservation of the environment and resources. At its annual meeting in June 2023, the DFG therefore attached particular importance to discussing the topic of sustainability and expressly spoke out in favour of anchoring aspects of ecological sustainability in DFG funding activities. It does this in its role as the largest research funding organisation in Germany and as a key agent in setting the framework conditions for the research system.

All in all, the DFG is pursuing a “learning process” that allows flexibility for iterative development and adaptation in research. At the same time, the aim is to stimulate creativity among the individuals and organisations involved so as to drive forward the process of change from within the research system itself.

Contact

Do you have an example or can you think of other topics/categories that we should include? If so, do feel free to get in touch with us. We welcome your suggestions and comments.

Team Nachhaltige Forschungsprozesse
E-mail: NachhaltigeForschungsprozesse@dfg.de