The information on this page focuses on individual grant programmes: individual projects (research grants) and the funding of individual researchers (Walter Benjamin Programme, Emmy Noether Programme, Heisenberg Programme, and Reinhart Koselleck Projects). However, many aspects also apply to reviews for other DFG programmes.
Good reasons to review for the DFG
Why is the DFG asking me to provide a review?
Expertise: The DFG Head Office invites suitably qualified and renowned national and international experts to review proposals submitted on specific research topics. Either the Head Office has identified you as a qualified and suitable reviewer or you have been recommended by peers.
Trust: The DFG entrusts you with reviewing proposals and other researchers’ scientific ideas.
Why should I act as a reviewer for the DFG?
Science-led funding decisions: As an organisation that reflects self-governance in research, the DFG makes its decisions based purely on scientific criteria. This means that researchers decide on the allocation of funding – free from political considerations and based solely on quality. By preparing a review, you are helping to uphold the principle of competitive funding based exclusively on scientific standards.
Familiarity with decision-making processes: As a reviewer, you gain insights into the review process and the work of DFG statutory bodies, and you find out how funding decisions are made.
Participation in academic discourse: Your review contributes to academic discussion on current research questions and the quality assessment of projects in your field. After the funding decision has been made, you will receive feedback on your review: the DFG Head Office provides you with details of other researchers’ reviews of the same proposal, the evaluation by the review board, and the final funding decision. This allows you to see how your review contributed to the decision-making process and the role your comments played in the further procedure.
Institutional visibility: Once a year, the DFG provides universities and non-university research institutions with information on the extent to which their researchers have participated in reviews and which of their researchers are members of the DFG’s statutory bodies.
Voluntary involvement: By providing a review, you are giving something back to the research community. Every successful proposal you yourself have submitted to the DFG is based on the voluntary contributions of researchers who supported your proposal.
Our website uses cookies that are strictly necessary for its technical functionality and cookies for the collection of statistical information (analytical cookies).
Statistical analysis of how our online service is used involves use of the “Matomo” analytics service on our website. Analytical cookies help us to improve our site and to optimise it in the interest of our users. Matomo uses cookies. These are small text files that are stored on your end device and enable us to analyse your use of our website. Evaluation of how visitors use our website is conducted in an anonymised form, which merely involves recording of your IP address in an abbreviated format. This means that we can’t identify you as a user. We do not pass on your data to third parties. We store the collected information for 13 months and then delete it.
For further information on our procedures, the terminology used (such as “cookies” and “statistics”) and your rights, please refer to our Data Protection Notice(externer Link). You can use the Cookie settings(externer Link) to revoke your consent to the processing of your data at any time.
